This year’s Annual Competition Policy Conference ‘Looking to the past, shaping the future’, took place on Thursday, 16 October. The conference focused on the last 40 years of competition policy and what lessons we can take with us to prepare us for the future. Susan Danger, CEO, AmCham EU kicked off the event by underling how strong competition policies are needed to reinforce Europe’s place as an attractive environment for businesses to invest. Elsa Sependa, Chair of the Competition Policy Committee, highlighted AmCham EU's role as a facilitator of transatlantic dialogue on competition policy at a moment of great change in regulation. During the event, we heard from Marc van der Woude, President, General Court of the European Union who identified everlasting trends in competition policy discussion and their value to both examinations of its past, and debate around its future.
Past and present: a recap of our 40th Competition Policy Conference
This year’s Annual Competition Policy Conference ‘Looking to the past, shaping the future’, took place on Thursday, 16 October. The conference focused on the last 40 years of competition policy and what lessons we can take with us to prepare us for the future. Susan Danger, CEO, AmCham EU kicked off the event by underling how strong competition policies are needed to reinforce Europe’s place as an attractive environment for businesses to invest. Elsa Sependa, Chair of the Competition Policy Committee, highlighted AmCham EU's role as a facilitator of transatlantic dialogue on competition policy at a moment of great change in regulation. During the event, we heard from Marc van der Woude, President, General Court of the European Union who identified everlasting trends in competition policy discussion and their value to both examinations of its past, and debate around its future.

The first panel was a reflection on the last 40 years of competition policy with panellists sharing experiences and anecdotes. They explored the different . roles the US has played in EU competition policy over the decades. Despite highs and lows in the relationship, the speakers made it clear that transatlantic discussion of competition policy was mutually beneficial. During the panel we heard from Maria Coppola, Director, Office of International Affairs, US Federal Trade Commission; Ian Forrester KC, Former Judge, General Court of the European Union and Sir Philip Lowe, Partner, Oxera Consulting. Luc Gyselen, Senior Counsel, Arnold & Porter moderated the panel while also sharing perspectives from his career.
The second panel of the day looked at how competition policy will need to change to stay up to date and fit for modern problems. Moderated by Lewis Crofts, Editor-at-Large, MLex , the panel looked at all sorts of challenges that competition policy will overcome, examining how to balance citizen protections while also reducing barriers for legitimate investment and business. Attendees heard from Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou, MEP (EPP, EL); Oliver Bethell, Head of Competition, Europe, Middle East and Africa, Google; Antonio Capobianco, Deputy Head, Competition Division, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); Linsey McCallum, Deputy Director-General, Antitrust and Regulation of Digital Platforms, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission. Thank you to Elsa Sependa (AT&T) Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU for moderating the event, our sponsor Illumina and our media partners PaRR and mLex.
Related items
:focal())
Delivering coherence in Europe’s foreign investment screening framework
Will Europe choose alignment or fragmentation in foreign investment screening? In a recent blog for fDi Intelligence, Malte Lohan, CEO, and Andrew Hill, Senior Policy Adviser, AmCham EU, examine how divergent national regimes have created legal uncertainty and unnecessary administrative burden for investors and authorities alike. Today’s patchwork encourages over-notification, overwhelms regulators with low-risk cases and introduces avoidable friction for capital. The revised EU Foreign Investment Screening Regulation presents an opportunity to enhance coherence and competitiveness. Its success will depend on consistent implementation across Member States. Convergence would streamline beneficial investment and strengthen the Single Market, while gold-plating risks renewed fragmentation. Read the full op-ed in fDi Intelligence’s Economic Security Watch.
:focal())
An effective, competitive and quality-driven Public Procurement Directive
The revision of the Public Procurement Directive (PPD) is a critical opportunity to unlock the full value of public procurement for European competitiveness and resilience. A simpler, more consistent and quality-driven framework would strengthen market access, attract a wider range of bidders and enable public buyers to select best-in-class solutions.
The revision should prioritise practical ‘how to buy’ reforms, including digitalisation, standardised templates and reusable documentation, to reduce administrative burdens and increase participation. In parallel, ‘what to buy’ reforms should focus on transparent and verifiable criteria that reward performance, security and life-cycle value while avoiding unnecessary complexity that risks reducing competition.
Learn how, if designed effectively, the PPD can support innovation, resilience and better outcomes for public buyers across the EU.
:focal())
Industry urges targeted reform of Foreign Subsidies Regulation to boost EU competitiveness
AmCham EU has joined eight industry associations to propose several ways to increase the Foreign Subsidies Regulation’s (FSR) proportionality and efficiency. Two years after its entry into force, the FSR has proven overly burdensome, impacting investment decisions and creating uncertainty for companies operating in the EU. The current scope requires excessive data collection and complex filings, diverting resources from growth and innovation. The coalition urges the European Commission to refine the FSR to focus on truly distortive subsidies, streamline procedures and strengthen data protection. Learn how targeted adjustments to the FSR can safeguard fair competition while boosting Europe’s competitiveness in the joint industry statement
Policy priorities
Insights and advocacy driving Europe’s policy agenda. Our priorities support growth, innovation and a stronger transatlantic economy.
Membership
Connecting business and policymakers to strengthen the voice of American companies in Europe.