42nd Annual Competition Policy Conference: in review
News
16 Oct 2025
Competition

This year’s Annual Competition Policy Conference, Cutting through the noise to shape effective competition policy, took place on Thursday, 17 October. The event examined how competition policy can contribute to economic resilience and strategic influence amidst growing global uncertainty. Maggy Peeters, Director of Communications and Outreach, and Angélique de Brousse (Johnson & Johnson), Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU opened the conference by underscoring the role of competition policy in shaping Europe’s industrial and geopolitical future. 

The first panel explored how geopolitical developments are influencing industrial strategies and the evolving role of competition tools. Astrid Cousin, Head of Unit, Commission Priorities and Strategic Coordination, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission, discussed how competition policy is adapting to meet the EU’s broader strategic and industrial objectives. Miriam Lexmann, MEP (EPP, SK) emphasised the need for measured policy tools rooted in both security and shared democratic values. Representing the technology sector, Alexandre Roure, Head of Policy, Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), highlighted the importance of fair, transparent and predictable policy frameworks for competitiveness and growth. With the guidance of Zach Meyers, Research Director, Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE), the discussion addressed the future of competition policy. 

Following a coffee break, the audience heard a fireside chat between Natalie Harsdorf, Director-General, Federal Austrian Competition Authority and Martijn Snoep, Chairman, Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets. The discussions looked at Austria and The Netherlands’ approaches to anti-competitive subthreshold transactions and reflected on how regulators are adapting their approaches to meet emerging industrial challenges while retaining certainty for investors. Moderated by Nicholas Hirst, Chief Correspondent, EU Competition, MLex, the conversation explored the interplay between certainty and adaptability in merger control. 

Offering an industry perspective, Sharon Marshall, Director, Europe, the Middle East and Africa Partnerships, Google, stressed that effective competition policy should drive innovation and facilitate collaborative partnerships. The conversation, moderated by Thibaut L'Ortye, Senior Director of Public Affairs, AmCham EU, highlighted the significant influence competition rules have on shaping markets. 

The final panel focused on reinforcing EU-US cooperation in competition enforcement. Inge Bernaerts, Director, Policy and Strategy, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission, emphasised the continued importance of collaboration around shared visions and values between regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Kevin Buckley, Vice-President, Global Government Affairs, Johnson & Johnson, highlighted the private sector’s need for predictability and standards to support innovation. Philip Lowe, Senior Advisor, Kekst CNC, reflected on mutual lessons to be drawn from the European and US approaches to enforcement, including the value of the Single Market as a driver of growth and prosperity. Moderated by Natalie McNelis, Bureau Chief, Mergermarket/PaRR, the panel reaffirmed the continued importance of transatlantic alignment and the Single Market to foster economic resilience and competitiveness. 

Thank you to everyone who attended, as well as our Premium sponsor Google and our Media Partner MLex. 

Related items

Position Paper
20 Jul 2026

Supporting competitiveness, innovation and investment through the Merger Guidelines

The revised Merger Guidelines1 (‘Guidelines’) should ensure that the EU merger control framework supports competitiveness, innovation and investment while preserving legal certainty, predictability and effective competition. The Guidelines should remain firmly anchored in the significant impediment of effective competition (SIEC) test, apply resilience and scale considerations in a headquarters-neutral and effects-based manner, and provide clearer analytical and evidentiary standards for resilience assessments and the new theories of harm.

The Guidelines should recognise the benefits of scale where these deliver demonstrable advantages for EU consumers, apply the innovation shield consistently across all acquirers, maintain appropriate safe harbours and ensure a balanced and symmetrical assessment of harms and benefits. The Guidelines should also strengthen predictability across overlapping transaction review regimes and provide greater certainty for both EU and non-EU investors. Together, these refinements would help ensure that merger control contributes to competitiveness, innovation and economic growth while maintaining a transparent and proportionate enforcement framework.

Competition
Read more
Read more about Supporting competitiveness, innovation and investment through the Merger Guidelines
Blog
3 Apr 2026

FSR compliance: ​complexity undermining competitiveness​

The EU proposed the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) in 2021 to address foreign subsidies distorting the Single Market. Operating as a screening instrument behind merger control, it requires companies to notify the European Commission of foreign financial contributions (FFCs) they may receive when participating in public procurement or mergers and acquisitions activity. Preventing FFCs from distorting the Single Market is an important goal – and one that must be achieved without creating its own disruptions.

Competition
Read more
Read more about FSR compliance: ​complexity undermining competitiveness​
News
3 Mar 2026

Delivering coherence in Europe’s foreign investment screening framework

Will Europe choose alignment or fragmentation in foreign investment screening? In a recent blog for fDi Intelligence, Malte Lohan, CEO, and Andrew Hill, Senior Policy Adviser, AmCham EU, examine how divergent national regimes have created legal uncertainty and unnecessary administrative burden for investors and authorities alike. Today’s patchwork encourages over-notification, overwhelms regulators with low-risk cases and introduces avoidable friction for capital. The revised EU Foreign Investment Screening Regulation presents an opportunity to enhance coherence and competitiveness. Its success will depend on consistent implementation across Member States. Convergence would streamline beneficial investment and strengthen the Single Market, while gold-plating risks renewed fragmentation. Read the full op-ed in fDi Intelligence’s Economic Security Watch.

Competition
Read more
Read more about Delivering coherence in Europe’s foreign investment screening framework