42nd Annual Competition Policy Conference: in review
News
16 Oct 2025
Competition

This year’s Annual Competition Policy Conference, Cutting through the noise to shape effective competition policy, took place on Thursday, 17 October. The event examined how competition policy can contribute to economic resilience and strategic influence amidst growing global uncertainty. Maggy Peeters, Director of Communications and Outreach, and Angélique de Brousse (Johnson & Johnson), Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU opened the conference by underscoring the role of competition policy in shaping Europe’s industrial and geopolitical future. 

The first panel explored how geopolitical developments are influencing industrial strategies and the evolving role of competition tools. Astrid Cousin, Head of Unit, Commission Priorities and Strategic Coordination, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission, discussed how competition policy is adapting to meet the EU’s broader strategic and industrial objectives. Miriam Lexmann, MEP (EPP, SK) emphasised the need for measured policy tools rooted in both security and shared democratic values. Representing the technology sector, Alexandre Roure, Head of Policy, Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), highlighted the importance of fair, transparent and predictable policy frameworks for competitiveness and growth. With the guidance of Zach Meyers, Research Director, Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE), the discussion addressed the future of competition policy. 

Following a coffee break, the audience heard a fireside chat between Natalie Harsdorf, Director-General, Federal Austrian Competition Authority and Martijn Snoep, Chairman, Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets. The discussions looked at Austria and The Netherlands’ approaches to anti-competitive subthreshold transactions and reflected on how regulators are adapting their approaches to meet emerging industrial challenges while retaining certainty for investors. Moderated by Nicholas Hirst, Chief Correspondent, EU Competition, MLex, the conversation explored the interplay between certainty and adaptability in merger control. 

Offering an industry perspective, Sharon Marshall, Director, Europe, the Middle East and Africa Partnerships, Google, stressed that effective competition policy should drive innovation and facilitate collaborative partnerships. The conversation, moderated by Thibaut L'Ortye, Senior Director of Public Affairs, AmCham EU, highlighted the significant influence competition rules have on shaping markets. 

The final panel focused on reinforcing EU-US cooperation in competition enforcement. Inge Bernaerts, Director, Policy and Strategy, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission, emphasised the continued importance of collaboration around shared visions and values between regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. Kevin Buckley, Vice-President, Global Government Affairs, Johnson & Johnson, highlighted the private sector’s need for predictability and standards to support innovation. Philip Lowe, Senior Advisor, Kekst CNC, reflected on mutual lessons to be drawn from the European and US approaches to enforcement, including the value of the Single Market as a driver of growth and prosperity. Moderated by Natalie McNelis, Bureau Chief, Mergermarket/PaRR, the panel reaffirmed the continued importance of transatlantic alignment and the Single Market to foster economic resilience and competitiveness. 

Thank you to everyone who attended, as well as our Premium sponsor Google and our Media Partner MLex. 

Related items

Position Paper
11 Feb 2026

An effective, competitive and quality-driven Public Procurement Directive

The revision of the Public Procurement Directive (PPD) is a critical opportunity to unlock the full value of public procurement for European competitiveness and resilience. A simpler, more consistent and quality-driven framework would strengthen market access, attract a wider range of bidders and enable public buyers to select best-in-class solutions. 

The revision should prioritise practical ‘how to buy’ reforms, including digitalisation, standardised templates and reusable documentation, to reduce administrative burdens and increase participation. In parallel, ‘what to buy’ reforms should focus on transparent and verifiable criteria that reward performance, security and life-cycle value while avoiding unnecessary complexity that risks reducing competition. 

Learn how, if designed effectively, the PPD can support innovation, resilience and better outcomes for public buyers across the EU. 

Competition
Read more
Read more about An effective, competitive and quality-driven Public Procurement Directive
Position Paper
9 Dec 2025

Industry urges targeted reform of Foreign Subsidies Regulation to boost EU competitiveness

AmCham EU has joined eight industry associations to propose several ways to increase the Foreign Subsidies Regulation’s (FSR) proportionality and efficiency. Two years after its entry into force, the FSR has proven overly burdensome, impacting investment decisions and creating uncertainty for companies operating in the EU. The current scope requires excessive data collection and complex filings, diverting resources from growth and innovation. The coalition urges the European Commission to refine the FSR to focus on truly distortive subsidies, streamline procedures and strengthen data protection. Learn how targeted adjustments to the FSR can safeguard fair competition while boosting Europe’s competitiveness in the joint industry statement

Competition
Read more
Read more about Industry urges targeted reform of Foreign Subsidies Regulation to boost EU competitiveness
Position Paper
2 Dec 2025

Building a more proportionate Foreign Subsidies Regulation

The Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) is designed to support fair competition in the EU, but after two years of use it has become more complex and demanding than expected. Companies face heavy reporting requirements, unclear procedures and rising compliance costs, which risk slowing investment and creating uncertainty. To keep Europe competitive, the framework needs to be more focused, balanced and easier to apply. Clearer rules and a more proportionate approach would help ensure the system works as intended. Learn how these improvements can strengthen the FSR and support a more predictable business environment.

Competition
Read more
Read more about Building a more proportionate Foreign Subsidies Regulation