41st Annual Competition Policy Conference: Balancing rules-based competition policy and economic security
News
17 Nov 2024
Competition
41st Annual Competition Policy Conference: Balancing rules-based competition policy and economic security

This year’s Annual Competition Policy Conference ‘Competition policy and economic security’, took place on Thursday, 14 November. The conference focused on how to balance a rules-based approach to competition policy with a more geopolitically-driven model. Malte Lohan, CEO and Elsa Sependa (AT&T), Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU kicked off the event by underling the need for effective and fair competition rules to ensure that Europe remains attractive and competitive on the global stage. During the event, we heard from Damien Gérard, Prosecutor General, Belgian Competition Authority who presented the Belgian Competition Authority’s approach of using competition policy to speed up the development of digital infrastructure. 

The first panel was an examination of how geopolitical trends shape regulation. Our panelists explored the numerous geoeconomic challenges facing the EU and how competition policy can be employed alongside other policy tools to address these challenges. During the panel we heard from Maria Demertzis, Director, Economic Strategy and Finance Program, The Conference Board Europe; Aura Salla, MEP (EPP, FI); Koen Van de Casteele, Director, State aid: General Scrutiny and Enforcement, Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission and Astri Van Dyke, Director, Global Competition Policy, Google. Ioannis Lianos, Professor, Competition Law and Policy, University College London moderated the discussion while also setting the scene by giving a historical view of competition policy developments from around the world. 

The second panel of the day looked at economic security, where our speakers considered the role national security plays in transaction screening. Moderated by Natalie McNelis, Senior Correspondent, MLex, the panel discussed the complexities around merger control rules and how a coordinated approach between Member States will make it easier for investment to make its way into the EU. Attendees heard from Ief Daems, Legal Director of Antitrust, Cisco; Chair, In-House Competition Lawyers Association (ICLA); Steffen Hindelang, Director and Co-Founder, CELIS Institute and Professor, International Investment and Trade Law, Uppsala University; Francesco Macchiaroli, General Counsel, Avio Aero and Aiste Slezeviciute, incoming Head of Sector, Foreign Direct Investment Screening, Directorate-General for Trade, European Commission 

Thank you to Elsa Sependa (AT&T) Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU for moderating the event, as well as our sponsor Baker Botts and our media partner MLex. 

Related items

Position Paper
11 Feb 2026

An effective, competitive and quality-driven Public Procurement Directive

The revision of the Public Procurement Directive (PPD) is a critical opportunity to unlock the full value of public procurement for European competitiveness and resilience. A simpler, more consistent and quality-driven framework would strengthen market access, attract a wider range of bidders and enable public buyers to select best-in-class solutions. 

The revision should prioritise practical ‘how to buy’ reforms, including digitalisation, standardised templates and reusable documentation, to reduce administrative burdens and increase participation. In parallel, ‘what to buy’ reforms should focus on transparent and verifiable criteria that reward performance, security and life-cycle value while avoiding unnecessary complexity that risks reducing competition. 

Learn how, if designed effectively, the PPD can support innovation, resilience and better outcomes for public buyers across the EU. 

Competition
Read more
Read more about An effective, competitive and quality-driven Public Procurement Directive
Position Paper
9 Dec 2025

Industry urges targeted reform of Foreign Subsidies Regulation to boost EU competitiveness

AmCham EU has joined eight industry associations to propose several ways to increase the Foreign Subsidies Regulation’s (FSR) proportionality and efficiency. Two years after its entry into force, the FSR has proven overly burdensome, impacting investment decisions and creating uncertainty for companies operating in the EU. The current scope requires excessive data collection and complex filings, diverting resources from growth and innovation. The coalition urges the European Commission to refine the FSR to focus on truly distortive subsidies, streamline procedures and strengthen data protection. Learn how targeted adjustments to the FSR can safeguard fair competition while boosting Europe’s competitiveness in the joint industry statement

Competition
Read more
Read more about Industry urges targeted reform of Foreign Subsidies Regulation to boost EU competitiveness
Position Paper
2 Dec 2025

Building a more proportionate Foreign Subsidies Regulation

The Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) is designed to support fair competition in the EU, but after two years of use it has become more complex and demanding than expected. Companies face heavy reporting requirements, unclear procedures and rising compliance costs, which risk slowing investment and creating uncertainty. To keep Europe competitive, the framework needs to be more focused, balanced and easier to apply. Clearer rules and a more proportionate approach would help ensure the system works as intended. Learn how these improvements can strengthen the FSR and support a more predictable business environment.

Competition
Read more
Read more about Building a more proportionate Foreign Subsidies Regulation