The deadline for Romania's early implementation of the Public Country-by-Country Reporting (pCbCR) Directive is fast approaching. With the European Commission's template and electronic reporting formats expected in the third quarter of this year, businesses face significant challenges in setting up compliance systems and obtaining audits before the 31 December 2024 deadline. This rush could lead to inconsistent reports and increased administrative burdens. Learn why Romania should defer their implementation to align with other Member States and ensure consistency while reducing strain on businesses.
Letter: Defer Romania’s early implementation of the Public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive
Related items
:focal())
Closing the gap between customs and VAT rules
The reform of the Union Customs Code changes who is treated as the ‘importer’ when a non-EU company uses an indirect customs representative. That creates a problem under the EU VAT Directive, which links import VAT deduction to being identified as the importer or consignee. In practice, the non-EU company may no longer meet that requirement, while the customs representative may not qualify for the deduction either.
That could leave import VAT irrecoverable and create uncertainty for businesses using established import models. The Commission should ensure that the non-EU principal can still be identified in customs data for VAT purposes and fix the mismatch between the UCC and the VAT Directive.
Learn more about what changes are needed to keep import VAT deductibility workable under the new customs framework.
:focal())
Principles for economically efficient and growth-compatible tax reform in the EU
The Draghi report highlights how economic growth has stagnated in the EU due to structural weaknesses that risk undermining the EU’s global competitiveness. To bolster the EU’s attractiveness and competitiveness, lawmakers should pursue a coherent pro-growth tax reform agenda. A pro-growth tax reform agenda in the EU27 can be evaluated through five principles: (a) economic efficiency, including low distortion of economic decisions and low administrative and compliance costs; (b) consideration and strong discipline across the entire lifecycle of tax policy reform: initial decision making process, legal design and implementation; (c) evidence-based accountability through clear objectives, rigorous impact assessment, meaningful consultation and ex post review; (d) strengthening the Single Market rather than adding cross-border frictions; and (e) neutrality and fair competitive conditions across sectors, countries and business models.
These principles are mutually reinforcing: growth is supported not only by sound and coherent statutory design, but by the full tax system including law, administration and taxpayer interaction. AmCham EU has prepared a framework for EU lawmakers to use while designing, implementing and evaluating tax policy based upon our members’ experiences operating in every EU Member State and almost every country around the world.
:focal())
Tax policy may not always make headlines – but its benefits certainly are
Policy priorities
Insights and advocacy driving Europe’s policy agenda. Our priorities support growth, innovation and a stronger transatlantic economy.
Membership
Connecting business and policymakers to strengthen the voice of American companies in Europe.