The deadline for Romania's early implementation of the Public Country-by-Country Reporting (pCbCR) Directive is fast approaching. With the European Commission's template and electronic reporting formats expected in the third quarter of this year, businesses face significant challenges in setting up compliance systems and obtaining audits before the 31 December 2024 deadline. This rush could lead to inconsistent reports and increased administrative burdens. Learn why Romania should defer their implementation to align with other Member States and ensure consistency while reducing strain on businesses.
Letter: Defer Romania’s early implementation of the Public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive
Related items
:focal())
Administrative cooperation for a simplified tax environment
The evaluation of the Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC) 1-9 can help enhance tax transparency, improve the Single Market and boost Europe’s competitiveness by decluttering tax policy. By ensuring that DAC includes fixed standards and mandating greater transparency for DAC data, lawmakers can improve its functionality. Likewise, by exempting Pillar 2 companies (including those subject to the ‘side-by-side’ safe harbour) from DAC 6 and revisiting the administrative requirements and outcomes of reporting under DAC 6, the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD), the Pillar 2 Directive and the Public Country by Country Reporting (pCbCR) Directive, lawmakers can minimise additional costs for companies and tax authorities alike while maintaining the integrity of the tax system.
:focal())
Harmonising electronic invoicing in the EU
The EU’s e-invoicing landscape is increasingly fragmented, with Member States imposing divergent formats, extra data fields, inconsistent definitions, validation rules and implementation timelines that drive up compliance costs – especially for SMEs – and undermine the Single Market.
Reforming the EU’s e-invoicing landscape is vital to deliver upon the vast simplification potential of VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) and the Public Procurement Directive revision.
Learn more about why the EU should establish a harmonised, interoperable EU framework for B2G and B2B e-invoicing by mandating the use of a common standard and limited variety of syntaxes, establishing common transmission methods and supporting efficient implementation.

Shaping effective investment screening frameworks with the CELIS Institute
On Thursday, 24 October, Andrew Hill, Senior Policy Adviser, AmCham EU represented the organisation by speaking at the Conference on Foreign Investment Screening, hosted by the CELIS Institute.The discussion focused on the evolving landscape of investment screening in Europe and ways to ensure that the Foreign Investment Screening Regulation best supports Europe’s security. It also highlighted the importance of honing investment screening towards the most risky investments, while creating optimal pathways for cooperation between agencies. Panellists also highlighted the growing need for transatlantic cooperation, the drive toward transparent screening mechanisms and the development of investment screening as a practice, and the future of investment screening in view of economic security.
Policy priorities
Insights and advocacy driving Europe’s policy agenda. Our priorities support growth, innovation and a stronger transatlantic economy.
Membership
Connecting business and policymakers to strengthen the voice of American companies in Europe.