G20: international tax deal shows multilateralism works

On Wednesday, 13 October, G20 Finance Ministers endorsed the political agreement reached last week by 136 countries to reform the international corporate tax framework. The American Chamber of Commerce to the EU (AmCham EU) generally supports the OECD Inclusive Framework deal, but urges further detailed work in order to ensure that the agreement succeeds in stabilising the international tax system and addressing challenges arising from the digitalisation of the global economy. 

News
13 Oct 2021
Tax
G20: international tax deal shows multilateralism works

On Wednesday, 13 October, G20 Finance Ministers endorsed the political agreement reached last week by 136 countries to reform the international corporate tax framework. The American Chamber of Commerce to the EU (AmCham EU) generally supports the OECD Inclusive Framework deal, but urges further detailed work in order to ensure that the agreement succeeds in stabilising the international tax system and addressing challenges arising from the digitalisation of the global economy. 

Will Morris, Chair, Tax Committee, AmCham EU, said: ‘After several years of negotiations, the agreement is a significant political achievement for international leaders. The deal is another important step towards creating a global tax system fit for the 21st century and demonstrates that multilateralism works. The framework also helpfully pauses the introduction of new unilateral measures.’ He went on to say: ‘However, parties, including the EU, should focus on the implementation of the deal. A lot of hard technical work still remains in order to put a system in place that is consistent across jurisdictions. Reducing complexity will be critical to the success of the new framework. Companies will also require sufficient time and a simplified compliance mechanism to adapt to the new rules. AmCham EU stands ready to provide detailed technical input and support to help achieve these goals.’

Related items

Position Paper
18 Feb 2026

Harmonising electronic invoicing in the EU

The EU’s e-invoicing landscape is increasingly fragmented, with Member States imposing divergent formats, extra data fields, inconsistent definitions, validation rules and implementation timelines that drive up compliance costs – especially for SMEs – and undermine the Single Market.

Reforming the EU’s e-invoicing landscape is vital to deliver upon the vast simplification potential of VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) and the Public Procurement Directive revision.

Learn more about why the EU should establish a harmonised, interoperable EU framework for B2G and B2B e-invoicing by mandating the use of a common standard and limited variety of syntaxes, establishing common transmission methods and supporting efficient implementation.  

Read more about Harmonising electronic invoicing in the EU
Shaping effective investment screening frameworks with the CELIS Institute
News
28 Oct 2025

Shaping effective investment screening frameworks with the CELIS Institute

On Thursday, 24 October, Andrew Hill, Senior Policy Adviser, AmCham EU represented the organisation by speaking at the Conference on Foreign Investment Screening, hosted by the CELIS Institute.The discussion focused on the evolving landscape of investment screening in Europe and ways to ensure that the Foreign Investment Screening Regulation best supports Europe’s security. It also highlighted the importance of honing investment screening towards the most risky investments, while creating optimal pathways for cooperation between agencies. Panellists also highlighted the growing need for transatlantic cooperation, the drive toward transparent screening mechanisms and the development of investment screening as a practice, and the future of investment screening in view of economic security. 

Read more about Shaping effective investment screening frameworks with the CELIS Institute
Position Paper
15 Sep 2025

Strengthening predictability in the draft Foreign Subsidies Regulation Guidelines

The draft Guidelines to the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) risk broadening the already excessive reach of the FSR and making its application even less certain for industry, adding to already disproportionate costs and complexities for businesses. The Guidelines should take the opposite approach, seeking to clarify unclear concepts related to the FSR’s application, hone its scope to focus only on subsidies with a demonstrable EU nexus and align the FSR’s treatment of foreign incentives with EU State aid rules.

Competition
Tax
Read more
Read more about Strengthening predictability in the draft Foreign Subsidies Regulation Guidelines