Related items

The evaluation of the Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC) 1-9 can help enhance tax transparency, improve the Single Market and boost Europe’s competitiveness by decluttering tax policy. By ensuring that DAC includes fixed standards and mandating greater transparency for DAC data, lawmakers can improve its functionality. Likewise, by exempting Pillar 2 companies (including those subject to the ‘side-by-side’ safe harbour) from DAC 6 and revisiting the administrative requirements and outcomes of reporting under DAC 6, the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD), the Pillar 2 Directive and the Public Country by Country Reporting (pCbCR) Directive, lawmakers can minimise additional costs for companies and tax authorities alike while maintaining the integrity of the tax system.

The EU’s e-invoicing landscape is increasingly fragmented, with Member States imposing divergent formats, extra data fields, inconsistent definitions, validation rules and implementation timelines that drive up compliance costs – especially for SMEs – and undermine the Single Market.

Reforming the EU’s e-invoicing landscape is vital to deliver upon the vast simplification potential of VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) and the Public Procurement Directive revision.

Learn more about why the EU should establish a harmonised, interoperable EU framework for B2G and B2B e-invoicing by mandating the use of a common standard and limited variety of syntaxes, establishing common transmission methods and supporting efficient implementation.  

The European Parliament’s November 2025 draft report on revitalising EU securitisation strengthens the Commission’s proposal by pushing further simplification, but it overlooks a central flaw in the framework: the misalignment between EU and non‑EU securitisations that continues to restrict EU investors’ access to global markets. Investor access should depend on whether sufficient information is available for due diligence, not on the use of a specific reporting template.

MEPs can make this fix by removing the template‑based verification requirement in Article 5(ii)(e) and anchoring investor due diligence in a clear, substance‑based ‘sufficient information’ standard. When combined with the Parliament’s encouraging simplification proposals, this targeted fix would lower operational costs, enable proportionate due diligence and strengthen market depth – all without weakening core safeguards.