Optimising distribution with local services

HP Inc. is a multinational information technology company that develops personal computers, printers and 3D printing solutions. Distribution centres located in Germany serve as the epicentre of the company’s European operations, with finished products arriving from its international factories, ready for shipment. Read how HP Inc.'s parterships with local businesses encourage the development of innovative solutions to specific problems.

News
15 Mar 2022
Optimising distribution with local services

HP Inc. contracts three distribution partners in Germany. Among these, one is a local distribution company, by the name of LGI. LGI has been working with HP Inc. for 20 years, since it was founded as a spin-off from the company itself. Originally, HP Inc. was LGI’s only customer, but nowadays the company accounts for 20% of LGI’s custom. LGI employs 300-500 people for HP Inc.-related activity. They run one of HP Inc.’s German distribution centres – operating the warehouse, providing storage solutions, packaging products, loading them into trucks and shipping them to their destination. LGI also manages inventory and returns on behalf of HP Inc.

For local suppliers, working with HP Inc. is advantageous because it provides an opportunity to find innovative solutions to specific problems. Smaller local suppliers are often more capable of providing niche services than global competitors. For example, in order to manage its logistics activity, HP Inc. enlisted the services of a local partner, which was able to offer HP Inc. a specific optimisation tool to match its particular needs. The service offering was customised to HP Inc.’s use-case to such a degree that no other global supplier on the market could rival the service.

Thanks to local suppliers, HP Inc. benefits from flexibility gains. By outsourcing, the company can reduce sunk costs in warehousing infrastructure and resources. HP Inc. can therefore focus its resources on its core competency of producing its bestin-class technology hardware.

Acknowledgement: Volker Schmitz, Global Head of Markets Supply Chain Operations

 

The success story of global trade lies in strong partnerships between companies of all sizes. Find out more about European ecosystems connecting small businesses with larger American companies. 

Related items

News
5 Jun 2026

Celebrating Gala 2026

Updates
Read more
Read more about Celebrating Gala 2026
News
5 Jun 2026

Maltese start-up Medilert wins AmCham EU Youth Entrepreneurship Award 2026

Social impact, inclusion and skills
Read more
Read more about Maltese start-up Medilert wins AmCham EU Youth Entrepreneurship Award 2026
News
5 Jun 2026

Tech Sovereignty Package: positive steps for energy resilience, but a risky gamble for digital competitiveness

This week the European Commission unveiled its Tech Sovereignty Package. While the Package’s energy proposals mark a significant step forward for EU energy resilience, the Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA) proposal overlooks the reality of global technology supply chains and introduces significant legal uncertainty and fragmentation for businesses.

The central question for the Tech Sovereignty Package is how to build resilience without undermining competitiveness. Concerns around overdependence on a limited number of providers, the risk of external disruption to service continuity and the long-term position of the EU’s digital industries are all legitimate. However, greater sovereignty will only be sustainable if it is built on a competitive, diverse and innovative digital ecosystem. The technologies that underpin the global digital economy are developed through highly international supply chains, with innovation spread across multiple markets.

Viewed through this lens, the individual proposals in the Package vary in the extent to which they reinforce resilience while preserving openness and competitiveness. In particular, the proposed CADA risks discriminating against providers that rely on global supply chains – both those based in Europe and those in third countries – even where they offer superior resilience.

‘An origin-based approach is too blunt for such a complex global market’, said Malte Lohan, CEO of the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union, commenting on the Package.

‘A more credible path to achieving greater resilience and control in such an interconnected landscape is to define sovereignty in terms of outcomes: secure and reliable technologies, customer choice, strong safeguards against undue interference and a business environment that supports investment and growth. That points to a risk-based framework where the EU is open to working with trusted partners. This trust should be assessed on the basis of objective standards rather than origin alone’, Mr Lohan added.

Last year alone, US technology firms operating in Europe and their supply chains supported €1.0 trillion in EU GDP, equivalent to 5.4% of total output. The scale of this contribution underscores the need for the EU to preserve an open environment with legal clarity and proportionality in any restrictions or safeguards that would impact commercial operations.

The Package’s Strategic Roadmap for Digitalisation and AI in energy is a positive step that could help unlock the benefits of digitalisation for Europe’s energy needs, enabling faster and more flexible grids. Digitalisation provides new opportunities to strengthen the reliability and resilience of energy systems. If executed well, the roadmap could support the growing demand of Europe’s digital and AI sectors for low-carbon energy.

Ultimately, the importance of the Tech Sovereignty Package extends well beyond the technology sector itself. Manufacturers, healthcare and life sciences, financial services, mobility, energy and retail all increasingly depend on access to advanced digital technologies to innovate and compete. For the Tech Sovereignty Package to support these sectors, it must ensure companies in Europe continue to benefit from economic openness.

Digital
Read more
Read more about Tech Sovereignty Package: positive steps for energy resilience, but a risky gamble for digital competitiveness