Related items

Construction and demolition waste accounts for more than a third of all waste generated in the EU, much of which ends up in landfills. Nearly 30 years ago, Paroc, a subsidiary of Owens Corning, began to help change this trajectory by launching one of the first stone wool recycling programmes in Sweden. Through the REWOOL system, stone wool offcuts from production and construction sites are collected, sorted and recycled into new insulation products. This approach supports circular economy business models, reduces reliance on virgin raw materials and improves building sustainability ratings. Customer demand continues to grow as REWOOL expands into new markets. Read the full story on Invested in Europe. 

Although the European Chemicals Agency’s updated Background Document improves the universal per and polyfluoroalkyl substances restriction, it disregards PFAS’ diverse properties and uses, fails to adequately apply the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals Regulation’s risk-based principles, proposes arbitrary general exemption timelines that do not reflect individual sectors’ realities, threatens to cause major disruptions across European supply chains and creates regulatory uncertainty, discouraging investment and innovation within the EU.

The Omnibus I political agreement announced yesterday broadly eases the sustainability compliance and due diligence burden for businesses under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), giving much-needed certainty to businesses. It is a significant achievement for the EU’s simplification agenda and ongoing efforts to reduce the regulatory burden. Specifically, the flexibility introduced in terms of the risk-based approach and how companies need to define adverse impacts will alleviate most of the excessive burden that existed under the original CSDDD. The revised transposition timeline of CSDDD to 2029 will also give all parties the necessary time to prepare for implementation.  

However, it appears that EU policymakers did not yet sufficiently tackle how these rules apply to the global activities of companies and groups – for example, by limiting the scope of the CSDDD to only those products and services with a logical link to the EU. This is a missed opportunity with far-reaching consequences that keeps legal uncertainty in place for global firms and their supply chains.  This oversight on extraterritorial impact will make the CSDDD more difficult for policymakers to implement and monitor and risks creating confusing overlap with other jurisdictions’ rules. 

The EU must use the next steps in the policy-making process – including implementing measures, guidance and future reviews – to fix outstanding challenges in both the CSDDD and the CSRD. In particular, clearer rules on when and how EU legislation impacts global business activities would give companies the predictability they need to invest and support sustainability investments.