Related items

The EU’s sustainable finance rules should help investors understand where their money is going and support Europe’s transition. The Commission’s proposal improves the current system, but some changes are still needed.

The new Transition category should focus on whether companies are cutting emissions, not on the sector they operate in. The 70% threshold should stay. The rules should also work with MiFID II and the EU Taxonomy.

Companies need 24 months to prepare. Firms that fall outside the new scope should stop reporting as soon as the rules enter into force.

Read the paper to learn how SFDR 2.0 can direct more capital towards Europe’s transition.

From Monday, 27 to Wednesday, 29 April, AmCham EU travelled to Paris, France and the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France for a series of meetings on EU financial services policy developments. The delegation engaged with representatives from French and European financial authorities, Members of the European Parliament, Accredited Parliamentary Assistants and Group Policy Advisers, to share business perspectives on the EU’s financial services agenda. Discussions focused on how to improve Europe’s competitiveness, deepen capital markets and create the right conditions for innovation in digital finance. Members also highlighted the need for more coherent and interoperable rules that reduce complexity while encouraging long-term investment through risk-based regulation.

The European Parliament’s November 2025 draft report on revitalising EU securitisation strengthens the Commission’s proposal by pushing further simplification, but it overlooks a central flaw in the framework: the misalignment between EU and non‑EU securitisations that continues to restrict EU investors’ access to global markets. Investor access should depend on whether sufficient information is available for due diligence, not on the use of a specific reporting template.

MEPs can make this fix by removing the template‑based verification requirement in Article 5(ii)(e) and anchoring investor due diligence in a clear, substance‑based ‘sufficient information’ standard. When combined with the Parliament’s encouraging simplification proposals, this targeted fix would lower operational costs, enable proportionate due diligence and strengthen market depth – all without weakening core safeguards.