On Wednesday, 18 November AmCham EU hosted the 37th Annual Competition Policy Conference sponsored by Baker Botts and Brunswick together with media partners MLex and PaRR. The conference was titled ‘A new world: The EU’s refit of competition policy and its impact on the economy and politics’ reflecting upon the impact of a number of initiatives in the area. View the conference here.
37th Annual Competition Conference
On Wednesday, 18 November AmCham EU hosted the 37th Annual Competition Policy Conference sponsored by Baker Botts and Brunswick together with media partners MLex and PaRR. The conference was titled ‘A new world: The EU’s refit of competition policy and its impact on the economy and politics’ reflecting upon the impact of a number of initiatives in the area. View the conference here.

Introductory remarks were provided by Zeger Vercouteren, Chair, AmCham EU (J&J) following which a keynote speech was offered by Olivier Guersent, Director-General for DG Competition. Referring to COVID-19 and the ongoing pandemic, Mr Guersent spoke about the opportunity to implement a new economic model as we rebuild from the crisis. Thus Europe – and the world – must now reflect on three challenges which also impact on competition policy: the need for a more resilient economy and the twin transition to a greener and more digitalised economy.
Professor Anu Bradford, Columbia Law School, provided questions to complement the keynote address. Her questions focused on the Digital Markets and Foreign Subsidies Acts. On foreign subsidies, Mr Guersent suggested that the goal is to create a network among Member States to facilitate good practice and assess acquisition of strategic assets by publicly funded companies. On the Digital Markets Act, he explained that a partial goal of the act is to equip the EU to deal with dominant market powers.
Two panels were hosted on the day.
The first panel, titled ‘Antitrust in the global context: Geopolitics, Digital Regulation, Trade Reform and the Green Deal’ was moderated by Dr. Salomé Cisnal de Ugarte, Vice-Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU (Hogan Lovells). Panellists included John Davies, Senior Advisor Regulatory and Public Affairs (Brunswick), Per Hellstrom, Senior Legal Director, EMA and India (Apple) and Damien Levie, Head of Unit, Technology and Security, FDI Screening (DG Trade, European Commission). Panellists discussed the impact of FDI screening and the implications of these new tools for clients and institutional actors and the responsibility of digital platform providers and impact of competition policy reform.
Moderated by Jay Modrall, Co-Chair, Competition Policy Committee, AmCham EU (Norton Rose Fulbright) the second panel focused on ‘EU Antitrust Reform: What to Expect in Merger Control and Antitrust Enforcement?’. Panellists included Inge Bernaerts, Director of Policy and Strategy, COMP.A, European Commission, David Cardwell, Counsel, Baker Botts and Dr. Carel Maske, Senior Attorney Antitrust, Microsoft. The panel discussed the implications of antitrust and merger reviews and tools from a client perspective, highlighting the need for simplicity and clarity.
Related items
:focal())
An effective, competitive and quality-driven Public Procurement Directive
The revision of the Public Procurement Directive (PPD) is a critical opportunity to unlock the full value of public procurement for European competitiveness and resilience. A simpler, more consistent and quality-driven framework would strengthen market access, attract a wider range of bidders and enable public buyers to select best-in-class solutions.
The revision should prioritise practical ‘how to buy’ reforms, including digitalisation, standardised templates and reusable documentation, to reduce administrative burdens and increase participation. In parallel, ‘what to buy’ reforms should focus on transparent and verifiable criteria that reward performance, security and life-cycle value while avoiding unnecessary complexity that risks reducing competition.
Learn how, if designed effectively, the PPD can support innovation, resilience and better outcomes for public buyers across the EU.
:focal())
Industry urges targeted reform of Foreign Subsidies Regulation to boost EU competitiveness
AmCham EU has joined eight industry associations to propose several ways to increase the Foreign Subsidies Regulation’s (FSR) proportionality and efficiency. Two years after its entry into force, the FSR has proven overly burdensome, impacting investment decisions and creating uncertainty for companies operating in the EU. The current scope requires excessive data collection and complex filings, diverting resources from growth and innovation. The coalition urges the European Commission to refine the FSR to focus on truly distortive subsidies, streamline procedures and strengthen data protection. Learn how targeted adjustments to the FSR can safeguard fair competition while boosting Europe’s competitiveness in the joint industry statement
:focal())
Building a more proportionate Foreign Subsidies Regulation
The Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) is designed to support fair competition in the EU, but after two years of use it has become more complex and demanding than expected. Companies face heavy reporting requirements, unclear procedures and rising compliance costs, which risk slowing investment and creating uncertainty. To keep Europe competitive, the framework needs to be more focused, balanced and easier to apply. Clearer rules and a more proportionate approach would help ensure the system works as intended. Learn how these improvements can strengthen the FSR and support a more predictable business environment.
Policy priorities
Insights and advocacy driving Europe’s policy agenda. Our priorities support growth, innovation and a stronger transatlantic economy.
Membership
Connecting business and policymakers to strengthen the voice of American companies in Europe.